FORWARD GC

Share this post
💢 The company that sued over a rating
newsletter.lawtrades.com

💢 The company that sued over a rating

Raad Ahmed
Jan 29, 2020
Comment
Share

Ratings are everywhere these days, from Uber trips to “best of” lists to requests to grade customer service agents. Are these ratings adjustable, or are they more like a permanent record? A Connecticut lawsuit helped us find out.

  • NetScout Systems, Inc. didn’t even get that bad of a rating: In a market research report released by Gartner Inc., NetScout, a publicly traded company that helps government and telecommunications clients monitor network performance, was described as a “challenger,” which was one peg below a “leader,” in its industry.  

  • But the company thought the fix was in: Gartner had invited to NetScout to purchase its market research services, but NetScout declined. So it filed a lawsuit, suggesting Gartner had concocted a pay-to-play scheme in which it gave preferential ratings to buyers.

Behold the power of the First Amendment

Gartner made the case a constitutional issue, arguing it was using its freedom of expression. The Connecticut Supreme Court agreed, siding with Gartner and arguing NetScout didn’t provide sufficient evidence to show any pay-to-play.    

The Verdict 

Whether you’re a massive conglomerate or 2-star rated Uber passenger, don’t expect your rating to get changed anytime soon. Permanent records, FTW.

CommentComment
ShareShare

Create your profile

0 subscriptions will be displayed on your profile (edit)

Skip for now

Only paid subscribers can comment on this post

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in

Check your email

For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.

Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.

TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

Š 2022 Lawtrades
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Publish on Substack Get the app
Substack is the home for great writing