đ˘ The company that sued over a rating
Ratings are everywhere these days, from Uber trips to âbest ofâ lists to requests to grade customer service agents. Are these ratings adjustable, or are they more like a permanent record? A Connecticut lawsuit helped us find out.
NetScout Systems, Inc. didnât even get that bad of a rating: In a market research report released by Gartner Inc., NetScout, a publicly traded company that helps government and telecommunications clients monitor network performance, was described as a âchallenger,â which was one peg below a âleader,â in its industry.
But the company thought the fix was in: Gartner had invited to NetScout to purchase its market research services, but NetScout declined. So it filed a lawsuit, suggesting Gartner had concocted a pay-to-play scheme in which it gave preferential ratings to buyers.
Behold the power of the First Amendment
Gartner made the case a constitutional issue, arguing it was using its freedom of expression. The Connecticut Supreme Court agreed, siding with Gartner and arguing NetScout didnât provide sufficient evidence to show any pay-to-play.
The Verdict
Whether youâre a massive conglomerate or 2-star rated Uber passenger, donât expect your rating to get changed anytime soon. Permanent records, FTW.
Create your profile
Only paid subscribers can comment on this post
Check your email
For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.
Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.